View Single Post
  #4  
Old 02-10-2006, 10:36 AM
jukofyork jukofyork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Leeds, UK.
Posts: 2,551
Default Re: PokerDaVinci January BETA: semi-public release

[ QUOTE ]
PokerDaVinci has higher system requirements that an app like PokerTracker. We use a real database system (Microsoft SQL Server) and .NET 1.1 as a platform. Don't expect to run it on a 7 year old laptop and be happy with the results. You are going to probably want a screen of at least 1024x768, a decent processor and 256MB+ of RAM. It requires Windows 2000, XP or Vista.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just one question:

If you were to benchmark your product on say importing and using 1 million hands or more, then how does your product compare to Poker Tracker, Poker Office and Poker Manager.

So far I found Poker Manager wins hands down in respect to this question: it is about 3-4 times faster for import than either Poker Tracker or Poker Office <u>AND</u> DB performance does not seem to degrade badly as more hands get imported [as in other products]). Extra functionality is not helpful to me, if speed issues make a product totally unusable... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

The only reason I ask this is because I don't want to waste yet another 2/3 days importing hands only to find it is not what I am looking for. For me personally the DB speed is the main factor and some kind of standard benchmark would help me most in judging which product is best [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote