Re: I own mike mautsow
[ QUOTE ]
Hello all
To the people unsure of the singularity between the sessions. All our data is identical in hands, time played and $ save a few small discrepencies in G2CU's figures..Who actually has less hands. Unless you believe that both dataminers accidently picked up the same session and that the session was about 2 minutes long and lasted 7 hands, you have to admit that all 3 data sets are from the same time period.
Since two corroborate indentically and one does not, I think the terms have been met. But that's for the panel to decide.
FWIW, I have no bias against Nath being on the panel. His comments were all made before we had the second dataminer's results which is what my argument is based around, so he has new evidence upon which he can make a different judgement.
[/ QUOTE ]
One possibility is that the session in question happened in the afternoon/evening (I'm pretty sure about this). It may have gone past midnight (I'm not sure about this). There may have been another session in the morning (I have no idea about this). The data miners might have picked up the morning session and left off the session which went past midnight. That session might have been 7 hands longer and 10K less successful. Since that would just be a problem with the way PT matches to what we need, obviously the data miners would have the same (wrong) stats.
It is a situation like that which would be avoided if we had two identical data sets of the ENTIRE session which we could then check for matching times, etc. Right now, we can't even check that the times of the 25/50 data are the same times as the 50/100 data, etc.
|