[Rolen]

[ QUOTE ]
OK, to summarise:

We have Jman28, Inyaface, and raptor517 all confirming that he, indeed, won the 10K. From good2cu, we have a screen shot, and I have in PM his starting and ending bankroll which indeed are more than 10K apart. They are precisely as far apart, in fact, as the screen shot would indicate and this PM was before he had the PT stats available.

We also have a few additional people (e.g. Dean) vouching for g2cu's general trustworthiness and unlikelihood of being inaccurate in his representation of his results.

We also have highstakes's datamining, which does not cover 25/50 but which shows him being down 10K more than the PT stats indicate. Highstakes cannot explain this difference since he doesnt have access to the PT data, but his explanation is that it is possibly an error in PT, in his data mining, or somewhere in the site software.

My view is that the fact that the PM (which I can share if g2cu allows) is from before the PT stats were available and precisely confirms the amount won indicated by the PT screen shot, along with the confirmation from Jman, IYF, and Raptor, shows sufficient proof for me to win the bet. I think the data mining is inaccurate and highstakes, himself, does not confirm its accuracy.

Rolen, do you agree?

[/ QUOTE ]

What do you think. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Seriously though, the issue of contention is G2CU's trustworthiness on 2+2. Him telling other people that he won 10K is nothing and you know that.

The PM's you have regarding his online bankroll is interesting, but not IMO as interesting as an independant source that shows that G2CU's own PT data might be false. As Dean pointed out, if we take highstakes' data and add it to G2CU's 25/50, I win the bet. But I wouldn't think that this would be enough to resolve it.

As long as we do not have have two data sources that we both agree are valid and almost identical, we can't settle the bet. We're still missing 10K somewhere.