Re: very flawed test
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
not sure I understand the scoring of the test. Took it once, tried to think about the answers, got interrupted a few times. I got 100.
Took it again, as fast as possible, under 1 minute for whole thing, answering fold when it was an option, 1st answer otherwise, and only giving any time to a couple of questions.
Got exactly 100 again. Difference in time must have made up for my almost random answers.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, this is the problem. This isn't a test of poker smarts...its a test of speed. They didnt tell us that did they? if they had we could have optimized our strategy.
[/ QUOTE ]
ok. this probably explains why i got 91.
i took the test at work over 3 hours and got 0% on the time factor.
[/ QUOTE ]
sweet, I'm not the only degenerate that didn't score above 100.
Then again, I think that based on the test I'm a calling station [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|