Re: very flawed test
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
not sure I understand the scoring of the test. Took it once, tried to think about the answers, got interrupted a few times. I got 100.
Took it again, as fast as possible, under 1 minute for whole thing, answering fold when it was an option, 1st answer otherwise, and only giving any time to a couple of questions.
Got exactly 100 again. Difference in time must have made up for my almost random answers.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, this is the problem. This isn't a test of poker smarts...its a test of speed. They didnt tell us that did they? if they had we could have optimized our strategy.
[/ QUOTE ]
ok. this probably explains why i got 91.
i took the test at work over 3 hours and got 0% on the time factor.
[/ QUOTE ]
just about anybody who has played some poker can zip through and get 110 if they go fast...taking your time is the big issue here (which is what we are trained to do as poker players??).
|