[mbpoker]

[ QUOTE ]
Let's say there are 3 players, of all different vip levels goldstar, platinum, and supernova. And these players ONLY want to use their fpps for cash bonuses. Comparing these players to the 27% FTP rakeback equivalent players, would would be winning out and getting out more value?

Assumptions on these stars players:

-The player at goldstar and platinum can only play enough to stay within their respective levels for various reason.
-They are all moderately winning players.
-FTP rakeback affiliate is legit and FTP player equivalent cashes out their RB regularly.
-Everyone in this scenario are NL cash game 6 max players.

simple answer to this question. Thanks.


[/ QUOTE ]

I would estimate that Stars Supernova will be better off. Platinum can be close, depending on game limits, and FTP player will be better off than Stars Gold.

That ignoring any freerolls, reload bonuses, and transaction fees, where Stars doesn't deduct them and FTP does.