[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
which still has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH my (and ansky's) point that small stakes players have no business talking [censored] to tournament players. it's like you didn't even read the [censored] thread before you posted. (there's another grievance worth airing, btw) i'm starting to see how you got your old title

[/ QUOTE ]

How is this thread helping you see that I specifically asked for my old title as a joke (much like my current title) because in the past I made some poker videos w/ commentary that a lot of 2+2ers found entertaining?

[/ QUOTE ]
It's helping me see that you share a similar douchiness with Prof77

[ QUOTE ]
In addition, since we're talking about reading comprehension: According to you, high stakes players can talk [censored] about tourney donks because they make more money. Yet, in the case of people like Jamie Gold and other winners of major tournaments, this isn't true; tourney donks take down the big money. So again, will you please explain why this justifies HSNL players (yet prohibits SSNL players from) talking [censored]? Do you understand now that I've explicitly spelled it out for you?

[/ QUOTE ]
I think they're all stupid for talking [censored], but at least HSNLers have a legitimate case that they are better players who will make more money in the long run, whereas you micro grinders are talking [censored] because you're insecure and/or jealous

And as long as we're talking reading comprehension:

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nath, you're just an [censored], go [censored] yourself

[/ QUOTE ]
Yo bitch, if you're gonna be a [censored] I'll HU you for your roll so you really have something to cry about

[/ QUOTE ]