Re: Pro Bowl Players
THREAD HIGHLIGHTS
The only one you showed was that Westbrook is a more effective receiver, which I could say is useless because that is a result of offensive scheme.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As for % of total offense, it's a useless stat.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why?
[/ QUOTE ]
Because it favors featured players in bad offenses and has little correlation with a player's contribution to winning football games.
[/ QUOTE ]
Since when is the Pro Bowl about teams winning football games? If that's the case why are Driver, Boldin, Bulger, etc. on the team?
[/ QUOTE ]
anyone that played over 8 games, hahaha...but umm, in honesty, id put vick or even mcnabb (who, despite being hurt, has played in MORE GAMES THAN ROMO)
Who said the pro bowl is about who is more valuable?
[ QUOTE ]
Westbrook leads all NFC running backs in DPAR.
[/ QUOTE ]
Actually he doesn't. Per this link: DPAR (note: per that link, actually he does)
Why is a receiving threat such a big deal? He's supposed to be a RB position on the pro bowl.
|