[Ali shmali]

[ QUOTE ]
This one stood out to me the most...

POKERSTARS GAME #7396709777: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($10/$20) - 2006/12/11 - 11:40:37 (ET)
Table 'Aegina II' 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: LittleZen ($2715 in chips)
Seat 2: twin-caracas ($3976.50 in chips)
Seat 3: Keesbussum ($4720 in chips)
Seat 5: Shifty1768 ($7270.50 in chips)
Seat 6: newhizzle ($1205.50 in chips)
LittleZen: posts small blind $10
twin-caracas: posts big blind $20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to newhizzle [5d 7d]
Keesbussum: folds
Shifty1768: folds
newhizzle: calls $20
LittleZen: folds
twin-caracas: checks
*** FLOP *** [As Ad Ac]
twin-caracas: checks
newhizzle: checks
*** TURN *** [As Ad Ac] [6d]
twin-caracas: checks
newhizzle: checks
*** RIVER *** [As Ad Ac 6d] [4d]
twin-caracas: bets $60
newhizzle: raises $60 to $120
twin-caracas: raises $360 to $480
newhizzle: calls $360
*** SHOW DOWN ***
twin-caracas: shows [3d Ah] (four of a kind, Aces)
newhizzle: mucks hand
twin-caracas collected $1008 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $1010 | Rake $2
Board [As Ad Ac 6d 4d]
Seat 1: LittleZen (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: twin-caracas (big blind) showed [3d Ah] and won ($1008) with four of a kind, Aces
Seat 3: Keesbussum folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Shifty1768 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: newhizzle (button) mucked [5d 7d]

I just can't see under any circumstances how even a low limit grinder could play a hand like this. It's horrendous. I mean, I'm reading this correctly, right? She called a huge over raise on the river with 7 high?

[/ QUOTE ]

she thought she had a straight? lol

I'm not sure what to think about the chimp dumping theory. A lot of those plays just seem desperate and others like this one are completely apathetic, which would coincide with the frame of mind she was probably in at the time. How much money did twin caracas win off of her?