[UATrewqaz]

Agreed.

Is the book Hold'Em centric?

I'm rather intellectually lazy and don't care about the math behind some imaginary poker variants, unless it translates into a better winrate directly at Hold'Em

In other words, I'd like to see the math concepts that are in play as they relate directly to Hold Em.

Obviously one can learn them theorectially then apply them to Hold Em, but like I said, lazy.