View Single Post
  #26  
Old 11-26-2006, 11:30 PM
bugstud bugstud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HEISMAN!
Posts: 10,151
Default Re: So uh, how bad is the variance supposed to be at 2-7?

[ QUOTE ]
"and oddly it becomes more beatable as the limits increase, which I would never say the same for any other game I play."

TT I don't know how high you play but this is definitely wrong. Well, maybe its right to a point, but there is no way 30/60 is harder than 80/160, and 150/300 is ABSOLUTELY harder still.

And yea, the variance in TD is sick; i'll win and lose 70 bb in a session fairly regularly (and obv have done way more than that). By the same token if i lost 150 bb at 2/4 td i'd probably be doing some serious self analysis...

[/ QUOTE ]

this was also really wrong on ub. 30 and 80 were the best td games on the site that I played. never got crazy enough to play 150 tho. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote