Re: Casino Royale
<font color="white"> The hands were not the best, but they were not the worst. I was particularly annoyed by the bit where Bond is supposed to think that Scar-eye's min-raise is a bluff, when the pot is offering something like 4:1 on a call. And then why the reraise? If he's on a bluff, he's surely not going to call. Is Scar-eye supposed to be a maniac? Is Bond expecting him to re-reraise all in on a stone bluff? That's the only way the reraise to 2 million makes sense, which means it doesn't. As soon as Scar-eye went all in and Bond called him, I whispered to my wife "Quad jacks." </font>
|