Re: Player Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
Mason,
I can see why many of the best posters end up leaving 2+2. I wasn't around when others(Abdul Jalib, etc.) left but I can see by your treatment of Diablo in this problem why others in the past have left. It sucks to swallow your pride and saw you are wrong, but as a mature adult you sometimes need to.
Brian
[/ QUOTE ]
This quote:
"My answer was that if someone was all-in, the jacks would be better, but if they each had chips left, which was the case here, the ace-queen suited was better."
from the original post makes it clear that his intended point had something to do with postflop action.
If the "real point" was this business about AQs having a profitable call, then it would be true whether or not the players were allin. If JJ's $150 raise were allin, AQs should still call, because the call has positive expectation. By calling, AQs takes $ from JJ. Exact same as if there is money behind. Yet Mason's OP claims that AQs > JJ only if there is money behind. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PROFITABLE CALL ARGUMENT HE MAKES LATER
This entire thread is an exercise in ego. He reconstructed his argument because he refused to admit he was wrong. What a joke.
|