[PokerBob]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The senate will be hard since uneducated people in Wyoming, Idaho, etc vote against their own interests.

If you believe this is true, then the onus lies on democrats to be better educators and campaigners.

Also, paging Copernicus to this thread. Paging Copernicus to this thread. We need responses to some rebuttals.

[/ QUOTE ]

There have been no rebuttals to my statement, only dismissals of the relevance of the history of 6th year administrations, erroneous claims that winning the House and not the Senate is "huge", and guesses at the outcome of the election that appear to be based on week old polls.

When a supposedly equal or superior team is spotted 21 points in a game, winning by 10 is nothing to gloat about.

[/ QUOTE ]

You clearly have some deep issues. You are like a fan of a sports team who has fallen from grace. You cannot celebrate the accomplishments of your team, because your team sucks. So instead, you attack the team of your rival with moronic statements like "Well, you should have KILLED us because we totally suck, but you didn't, so you must suck too." This attitude is common, BUT IN THE WORLD OF SPORTS where the outcome really doesn't matter in the whole grand scheme of things and the where the majority of those doing the arguing are drunken idiots.

This is not sports. It is politics. The policies that get implemented can profoundly affect lives and the world in which we live. Do you even get that? Or do you merely like being associated with a "winner" and like to make sure that your rival feels like a "loser"? Seek help.