Re: Analysis
Personally, I'm confused as to which "others" are supposed to explain here. There are no "others", unless Sklansky/Miller somehow agree with Mason and can prove it (which is pretty much impossible, given the math clearly shows JJ has higher +EV in the situation Mason described). Somehow I doubt Sklansky/Miller would even agree with the original statement, and I assume thats why they have refrained from responding.
Although saying "you have had enough" may have been +EV, as you were not getting anywhere avoiding the original question, it would have been more +EV to admit your mistake, as illustrated by Diablo's simple math. Do you see why?
P.S. I'm still going to buy the Miller/Sklansky book, and I don't think this thread should discourage anyone else from doing so.
|