Re: Gold responds in some detail to allegations
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The more I see about this case the more it looks like Gold is the lesser of two scumbags.
[/ QUOTE ]
which means that his lawyers have managed to cast a reasonable doubt in the minds of the 2+2 jury that there was any deal. I'm no expert, but it hardly looks like a lock for Leyser. I wonder what Leyser would be willing to settle for to end this. I know my figure would be a lot lower than 6M.
[/ QUOTE ]
p.s. this is a civil case, not a criminal one.
"reasonable doubt" is the standard of proof only for criminal cases. In civil ones it is only required to prove that something is "more likely than not" >> in other words, that there's a greater than 50% chance.
Gold needs to do far more than prove a 'reasonable doubt.'
|