Re: Player Discussion
[ QUOTE ]
Feel free to do any math you would like to try and disprove what I've shown. Until you do that...
I'm sorry, but I have had enough. I'll let others elaborate.
[/ QUOTE ]
In the JJ example you said the $150 reraise was allready in the pot so it was not part of his negative EV. Well, what if AQ would reraise $150 instead of call, now according to your thinking AQ's $300 is already in the pot and not part of its negative EV and JJ has a decison to call $150. So AQ can only lose the 4% of the time J flops with A or Q because 67% of the time it will miss the flop and fold, and according to your previous logic the $300 was dead money and not a loss because AQ had already raised.
For the poster who said JJ had position please reread the original post by Mason and you will see that he said
What happen was that a player raised to $40 and then got reraised to $150. The original raiser then folded and showed AQ. His opponent then showed JJ.
JJ could have limped reraised or been in the blinds it is unclear. But the hypothesis is position or not JJ will make a 3/4 pot continuation bet no matter what. Meaning if he acts first or it is checked to him.
I noticed most dissenting post are filled with vitrolic language which is very unprofessional. If you disagree state your case, you are all giveig poker players a bad image! LOFL!
|