Re: Analysis
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
this is one of the most dissapointing threads i have ever read. either mason communicated his question very very poorly in his first post (less likely) or he got trapped and is backpeddling like a mother [censored] (more likely)
and on top of this he takes a condescending tone with his dissenters?
[/ QUOTE ]
It's just another example of "when a genius is certain". I put my money on Mason [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
I am a betting man and would be willing to wager a sizeable amount that Sklansky (and Miller, but he is just MIT, not genius) would agree with me that, given the assumptions Mason has laid out, JJ is the better hand in this situation, where better is defined as the higher +EV hand that you would rather hold in the situation as defined by Mason.
|