Re: Doyles Fold Of QQ at the 50k Horse Final Table!
[ QUOTE ]
I was not joking, I still think it was collusion, in fact I am 100% sure. They both knew that it was obvious and that's why they looked extremely uncomfortable with it.
Flop comes 2-3-7 rainbow and Chip re-raises the minimum giving Doyle the chance to move in with aces in which case he would have folded his kings without much of a thought (losing the minimum on the play)...
[/ QUOTE ]
This makes sense to me on the surface, without thinking about it further. Collusion but not really cheating.
One theoretical question I wonder about sometimes, not of practical interest to me because I don't play 4000/8000 nor with any regulars -- if 9 people are at a table and they know each others' betting patterns, and then a 10th player sits down, isn't that 10th player at a disadvantage? Don't we see that in posts here with "reads" all the time?
The implications remind me of prisoner's dilemma a little bit...
|