[mikechops]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think the whole theorm is a over-rated. It certainly isn't what I'd call fundamental. Talking about inducing a 'mistake' from an opponent, when he doesn't know your cards and you don't know his, is a bit silly.

[/ QUOTE ]
<font color="blue"> PLEASE everyone, argue the theory, not the assumptions, it's way more productive. Don't play semantics. </font>



[/ QUOTE ]

Poker is a fundamentally a game of imperfect information. I would respectfully suggest that pointing this out is not playing semantics.

[ QUOTE ]

The Fundamental Theorem is indeed fundamental, it is not simple. It is not the introductory theorem. It's incredibly complex and far reaching.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Dictionary.com
Fundamental - Of or relating to the foundation or base; elementary


[/ QUOTE ]