[amoeba]

hi mason,

i don't know if you have time but if you could, read one of my posts later on in this thread.

I think the premise is skewed towards AQ here. it is a very simple math problem if we assume JJ is betting any flop. AQ is taking a strategy which is dependent on what flops but JJ is not which lies at the heart of the problem.

the conclusion is not that AQ is the better hand but rather the player with JJ is not playing them optimally if he autobets the flop.

it is a rather simple math problem if we assume that JJ will autobet any flop and will bet exactly that much but it does nothing to prove that AQ is the better hand.