Re: Analysis
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I ask you one more time. Please explain your rationale for preferring AQs to JJ given the constraints and assumptions that you laid out.
[/ QUOTE ]
I give up. All I can say is that you need to reread the analysis I gave. That's the best I can do.
best wishes,
Mason
[/ QUOTE ]
That's the best you can do? You don't even compare how AQ fares against JJ!
Did you read my second analysis, Mason? Can you please explain anything that is incorrect about either my description of your well-defined problem or the EV calculations I provided?
I will ask one last favor of you. If you don't understand why I and other people are confused about your analysis, I would invite you to ask Ed and David to provide their take on the question you posed. Frankly, I would be very surprised if either of them believe that AQs is preferable given the question you posed and the assumptions you laid out. However, it is clear that either you or I are off-base on this issue. Whatever they show to be correct, they will be able to provide an explanation that helps either you or I understand where we are off-base. Seems like that explanation would benefit all users in this forum. All I am asking for is some rational mathematical based discourse on the situation you posed.
Is that fair, Mason? Can you request that your colleagues writing an NL book answer the question:
Given the assumptions Mason has laid out regarding post-flop play of these players (in his Analysis post), if AQs has raised then called a reraise by JJ preflop (and both players have chips remaining), which of these hands is now better to have, and what are their relative EVs?
Thank you.
|