Re: Analysis
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
67% of the time, AQ loses 150
26% of the time, AQ wins 165+225 = 390
7% of the time, AQ loses 150+225 = 375
= -100 + 101 - 26 = -25
[/ QUOTE ]
The above is wrong. I'll let others elaborate.
MM
[/ QUOTE ]
Mason, please explain what you believe is wrong about that equation in the context that I wrote it.
More importantly, please explain why you disagree with my calculations that show the EV of JJ (whether looking at the problem in terms of EV for the whole hand or EV post-flop) to be higher than that of AQs.
Ed, feel free to chime in as well. You're an MIT grad, so if there's an error in my post, I'm sure you could point it out and provide the correct relative EV calcs for JJ v. AQs using the assumptions Mason provided.
|