Re: Daniel Negreneau Verifies His Agreement With Me
[ QUOTE ]
"I think the reason why we think they disagree with you is because players like Paul Phillips, William Chen, Matt Matros, Greg Raymer and Dan Harrington have stated they they disagree with you (or at least make statements that contradict yours"
About successive chips being worth less? I don't think so. And it would only matter if William Chen did.
[/ QUOTE ]
I think most of these arguements are more about semantics than substance. I would like to see some specific examples of what is being discussed.
William Chen wrote a pretty good article in a "intelligent gambler" issue on the edge needed for taking a chance for all your chips.
I think on RPG you even agreed with him that in large field tournaments that chip EV is pretty close to $EV in the early stages.
Unfortunately, I have not been following all of your posts on the subject, so I do not know what kind of overlay Daniel agreed to, and I really do not know why you care so much about Daniel agreeing with you.
Does this mean if he disagrees with you elsewhere that is proof you are wrong?
|