View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-29-2006, 04:04 AM
Nate. Nate. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Reading Garner\'s usage dictionary
Posts: 2,189
Default Re: Big hand vs. Allen Cunningham

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry this hand seems totally absurd to me, when you put him on such a ridiculous tight range facing an open cutoff min steal raise with all these antes in the pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because over the first 6 hours of the day he has redefined the term 'nit.' He has played less than 5% of the hands including those where people min bet against his blinds.

These were my reads at the time; he could have been card dead for 6 hours but I think that my evaluation of his play is accurate. The read could have certaintly been incorrect but if there was one player at the table who I was studying closely the entire day it was Cunningham. He was the big stack at the table all day and I wanted to be careful to get any information that I could on his play since he was in position against me. I watched everything that he did on every hand and this was my read

[/ QUOTE ]

Fiji --

See above.

Another bizarre and completely untenable facet of your analysis is that you seem to think that Cunningham is unaware of the fact that you have seen him fold a lot in the last six hours.

--Nate
Reply With Quote