Re: \"Its better to be bettor than a caller because..\"
I agree the generalisation is correct. But the more correct it is percieved to be, the less correct it becomes.
And I think the reasoning behind this is the same as why you are supposed to bet. Because of the fold equity the bettor adds to his hand, the caller is getting more value than if he just bet, because then his opponent wouldn't be factoring in the fold equity.
|