[RikaKazak]

[ QUOTE ]
Ben, BF, Shaun:

I believe a number of the responses in this and some other recent threads are because this forum was created largely due to people's desire of having an NL forum where the discussion was oriented around somewhat advanced concepts. The level of hands that have been posted lately often are obvious in nature or show glaring basic mistakes. There are two other NL forums where people can learn basic stuff.

Additionally, Shaun, I and a couple of others asked you a simple serious question about your turn reasoning. Instead of focusing on the responses you did not like, how about just addressing the question that was asked? Perhaps that could result in some actual poker discussion that you could learn from. Yet, for some reason, you did not even respond to the question.

Mods, I think you guys should change the guidelines for this forum to 10-20NL and higher. People w/ interesting hands can use their judgement as to when something at lower stakes is interesting enough to post in this forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think changing it to 10/20 is going to help anything. I think only asking serious hand questions, with legitimate reads, etc. etc. should be allowed. As far as me laughing at the origianl post, this hand is so retarded it's a waste of my time to read it. This sounds like one of my NL 50 students coming to me and saying, "should I have gotten AA all in pf, is that an ok play?" I mean come on, I thought "high stakes" meant "high thinking" but it's turning into low stakes for people with more money.