Re: why I\'m an atheist...
[ QUOTE ]
The existence of unknowns does not increase the likelihood of the existence of that for which there is zero evidence.
[/ QUOTE ]I will have to think about that statement as it is very interesting. I would say there is some evidence in that there is order in the universe and it is a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics. But, you get into some tricky things with definitions.
However,I am more interested in the logic piece. Can you explain more? Lets say there is a case for which we know absolutely nothing about. So, to start, solution set = {all possible solutions}. We know the solution is in there because the set is infinite but we have no evidence because we havent started examining yet. Are you saying that all the possibilities are 0%. How does that jive with the fact that the solution exists within the set? What am I missing here?
|