[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Roads? Are you kidding me? Privatization would make driving ridiculously expensive.
[/ QUOTE ]
How so? Care to explain the assumptions you made and show your calculations? You do claim to be a scientist, don't you?
[/ QUOTE ]
I think that privatization's limitation is when a certain service's efficiency is compromised by determining who has paid for the service.
I am pro-privatization in most matters, but there are some that I don't think could be privatized. For example, the military. We need armed forces to protect our welfare (please just accept this as a premise, I don't want to debate it). In theory, the military benefits all members of the nation more or less equally; a war won for us benefits you as much as it benefits me.
So who should pay for it? If it were privatized, it would be correct for a citizen to
not pay their military fee, and reap the benefits regardless. But then, there would be no funding. The only reasonable way I see to do it is through taxes.
It's the same way with the police force and arguably a few other services, but I think this is the best example.
If anarcho-capitalism can come up with a way to privatize the military without compromising its efficiency, I'd like to hear it.
[/ QUOTE ]
The Myth of National Defense.
Enjoy.