Re: Full card predictions, kinda...
agreed on all counts with the exception of herman, but im not going to be too shocked if it goes the way you predicted.
the reason nate is on the undercard is because he was previously set to fight Thales Leites, which would have almost certainly gone to a decision because of their respective styles. still haunted by the sallavery v marquart debacle, zuffa decided to put the fight on the undercard. leites withdrew due to injury, wallace stepped up. as nate will surely sub him by the time the opening bell is done ringing, expect this to see this fight at some point during the event.
current line at BOF:
nate -550
wallace +450
absurdly safe money on nate.
|