Re: CCU...gone?
[ QUOTE ]
This is the dumbest thing I have ever heard. YOU voluntarily signed up with a guy who supposedly promised you money in an agreement between you and him. This has nothing to do with SIA. Let me guess, SIA should of contacted the U.S. government or should hire a P.I. to do a thorough background check on every Tom Dick and Harry who ever applied to become an affiliate?
[/ QUOTE ]
Are you honestly saying that their affiliates are absolutely no reflection on them? The point is that SIA can do whatever it wants, but when it contracts with scam artists, I can hold it against them since there are a ton of sportsbooks out there and many are better than SIA.
[ QUOTE ]
If you signed up for an underhanded rakeback deal with someone at Party and they ran off and never paid you, you would quit playing on Party? It's well documented all these scenarios are use at your own risk, yet you are the only one who chooses to put the blame on the site.
This is hysterical.
[/ QUOTE ]
That's fine that you think it's hysterical, but this is the way it works in the legal world. If you contract with someone to do work with you, you can be held responsible partially for their actions, both legally and in the public's eye. I don't really care about the $250, but that's what got me in the door at SIA. That's the reason why I placed wagers there well after I met the requirements for the stupid CCU deal, rather than sites I like better such as Pinnacle, Mansion and Bodog. As a customer, I'll spend my money in ways which give me the most value. You're getting awful defensive of SIA though.
|