[Jibba]

[ QUOTE ]
I understand your point and would be tempted to do so also.
but it's not like SIA is any different from any other site in this regard for the most part.
Party and almost every other site out there have some scumbag affiliates.

I don't begrudge SIA in this situation at all (unless I learn something more concrete that I actually should find fault with them).

I've also been informed that sportsbetting affiliates will not continue to make money from me if I continue to give them business.
I'm finding some worthwhile lines on SIA so I'll continue to make some bets there.


Much of the bonus requirement I was able to clear via a very small middle I found between them and another site so I never risked anything to clear the bonus-requirement.


For those who used it as part of their 'insurance' for the Mansion free Steelers bet awhile ago though I definitely understand being pretty ticked.


Also agree with dlk9 that we should give him a few days to respond.
Likely wishful thinking I admit as it seems pretty obvious he's outta here. But anything's possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with giving him a few days. I'm not one to jump to conclusions, but I will still hold SIA accountable to an extent. They contracted with someone who used their name to scam me. I didn't sign up for the Mansion deal (no hedges for me) so I was more focused on finding a good sportsbook that I can trust. SIA lost some of my trust by contracting with CCU (assuming the worst). There are tons of sportsbooks out there so I likely just won't use SIA unless it's necessary for some sort of arb. I guess it would just be principle for me. But I'm hoping he proves us all wrong.