[tdarko]

lastchance,

I must be lost or something b/c I completely disagree with all of this. First, I don't think you can compare the NFL with college football.

Secondly, if one team destroys another...I am not talking a squeeker but a big dominating win, this tells you that the winning team is better or at least should be considered better and Tennessee beat Cal fairly decidingly.

Your predictors and etc. still don't tell me anything. If a top 15 team plays a div II team why is the score taken seriously when a top 15 team beats the number #10 ranked team in the country by 18 or the #9 team in the country by 17 (as previously discussed)? In my eyes a decisive win against quality opponents shouldn't even be discussed on the same level as some blowout against a Div II team or UNT (30 minutes from my house) which, btw, is a team that gets blanked by Middle Tenn 35-0 and is the same team that lost to Oklahoma 59-0...well Tex only beat UNT 56-7 does that make Oklahoma better than Texas? I think we saw who was better yesterday, see score doesn't mean a whole lot.

You can give me all of predictors or whatever but I still haven't heard anything concrete that has convinced me as to why wins over some of the worst programs in Texas are better than wins against two teams ranked 9th and 10th in the country.