View Single Post
  #22  
Old 01-30-2006, 05:01 AM
DWarrior DWarrior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: stealing your food
Posts: 3,106
Default Re: Thoughts Regarding the Maniac Rebuy Strategy

Another possible thing to consider for the better players is time spent doing other stuff. I'm just switching over from cash to tournaments now, so I don't go beyond $50 buy-ins, usually sticking to $20 and $11 RAs (no big wins yet, only first couple of weeks), but I can see how someone like zeejustin wouldn't want to bother playing a 3k stack in a $10 buy-in beyond the first hour when the average is 6.5k, when he can just hop into the next $100 buy-in. Besides, I don't know how serious the top players take these tournaments, are they just playing for the win or do they really care about squeezing out a few dollars of EV in these small events?

It's kind of similar to me playing on the bubble and early in the money, I can freely steal because the $10-$40 win is meaningless to me, so I personally don't care about avoiding a gamble to gain a couple of extra bucks, whereas a lot of players seem to be crazy about "finishing up", even if "up" is $.14.

Same with Daniel Negreanu. Beyond merely getting the first prize money, there are a ton more incentives that come with being 1st: the bracelet, sponsorship deals, leaderboard rankings, resume, that it makes sense for the top players to play strictly for 1st place. When Sklansky advocated that using such a strategy passes up EV, he did not account for all the addons today's big tournaments receive.
Reply With Quote