Re: Lee Jones Flawed Thinking
David,
It would have been nice to see you jump in the discussions I was having when articles with very bad advice were printed in the 2+2 magazine (I pointed out the errors in two of the articles, one of which turned into an incredibly long thread) or in the very long NL thread where Mason and I were arguing about the EV of AQ v. JJ in a certain situation. In all of these cases, the 2+2-endorsed advice was clearly shown to be wrong, but none of the other 2+2 authors chimed in to take a position.
It is disappointing to see such a lack of discussion around 2+2 errors, while you guys are so quick to jump on Lee's alleged (I haven't read the article at issue here) errors.
|