Re: 530 Floating a Mid Pair
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
go on to insult other posters
[/ QUOTE ]
who did i insult?
i think it is silly to give somebody advice on a hand like this where 'floating' was in the title about whether or not to limp or raise the 66 PF, as if i did not know in standard nit SNG play that this is supposed to be a turbo-muck.
if we had a split forum these types of things would not happen, but we wont get into that again...though if we are going to have a single STT forum i think if you have never in your life played above $50 SNG's, you probably shouldn't be trying to give serious advice on a $530 hand. just my opinion.
[/ QUOTE ]
Logical fallacy: Appeal to Authority.
Really, are you trying to be a complete jackass here? You're succeeding.
[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
An appeal to authority is a type of argument in logic, consisting on basing the truth value of an otherwise unsupported assertion on the authority, knowledge or position of the person asserting it
[/ QUOTE ]
So what you are saying is that a person who has never before played a $530 SNG does have the necessary knowledge to give advice on it?
uhhhh....
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe that anyone who wins a lot at the $215s and $109s clearly has authority to give advice at a $530s. Ive played some of them, they arent revolutionary. As long as the opponent is a no-name, they generally play pretty badly, and maybe only slightly better than a no-name $215er/$109er.
|