[Shenlong]

"and I do believe athiests are fools. failing to admit the mere possibility of a god or an afterlife or opther metaphysical ideas is foolish. you can't prove them; there's no evidence to support them; but there is no evidence to disprove them, so it's possible. hence the agnostic idealogy. "

This would go both ways, would it not? If that's your argument, then everybody is a fool. If I'm a fool for not believing in what I can't disprove, aren't you also a fool for believing in what you can't prove?

Either way, it's kind of pointless to argue it in any case, wouldn't you agree?