Re: The war on faith.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Who said God was tolerant?
[/ QUOTE ]
Matt R.
He also said that Christianity never advocates violence and all religions have the same ideals.
I think he's now changed his position to: Christianity is tolerant (except of people we don't like), it never advocates violence (except when it's "just," meaning when I think it's okay), and (most) religions (sometimes claim to) have the same ideals.
Maybe I'm being unfair though - it's possible he hasn't backpedaled that far (yet).
[/ QUOTE ]
madnak,
It has recently become quite apparant to me that for you to follow my points of debate AT ALL, I have to carefully explain every little minute [censored] detail to you or you won't even come close to understanding what I am saying. Honestly, I'm sick of explaining [censored] to you. If I don't explain every little detail (even if it's the 3rd time I've said it), it means I'm backpedaling or I'm not being logical. No, I'm not re-explaining myself because it is completely obvious to anyone with half a [censored] brain what I'm saying and I shouldn't have to repeat it for the 14th time.
Your tactics of debate, when it becomes clear you've lost, resort to insulting and completely mangling the words I've used to suit your purpose. It quite honestly is not worth my time to respond, as it is clear you can't acknowledge any opposing points if they diminish your side at all, even if they are 100% correct.
As for your comments that I'm "bad at logic", I can only assure you that with my educational background this isn't the case. I promise that it only appears that way to you because any tiny leap in logic requires me to write a tome in order to bridge the mental gap for you, or you completely misconstrue the argument. Try taking an upper level math class and asking the professor to construct every single proof he does from the axioms from the first day of class. He'll think you're a [censored] riot. I know I do.
I think I may respond to some of your points since I last posted, simply because they are so retarded I feel like I must for my own sanity. I think 99% of them can actually be resolved by carefully re-reading stuff I've already posted in this thread though (without putting your own spin on things). I doubt you will put any honest effort into understanding them though... either that or they really are over your head. If no posts jump out at me as worthy of a response, it is because I think they are ludicrous and so self-evidently wrong that I would be wasting my time by typing something up. However, please don't delude yourself into thinking I've "backpedaled" or conceded my position if I do not reply.
[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|