[N 82 50 24]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I wish pokerdb has a ranking system. If there is, let me know.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, if you don't have them little stars thingies (like, um, this player is 8 stars out of 10 ZOMG) then the site is useless. USELESS, I TELL YA.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yea, I'm still not sure exactly what the point of a ranking system is. Just looking at the numbers in the sample link shown above should tell you what you need to know, especially after you look around for a bit.

The bottom line is that poker is really not a rankable type event on an overall basis. Obviously you can say X player has the most profit or Y player has the best ROI, but you can't say Z player is the best overall. It's way too subjective and pretty much meaningless in terms of evaluating the people you're playing against.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yah, ranking is uselss in MTT's. ROI and stuff is a lot more informative. As for interface - as an IT professional - I'd recommend finding 8-10 stats people look at the most and presenting them on a summary page (initial lookup) and let them drill down further if they want to. SharkScope kinda has a right idea interface-wise, IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's kinda the idea of the top section (summary statistics). The rest is just if you're curious about more specific data.