Re: Steps required to use FPHG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i've been using .07b for a few weeks, 12 tables on either party or empire 24 hrs a day. its been running great and i've had no problems. it stays around 2% (sometimes spiking to at most 4%) CPU usage and 3.5 MB of RAM
[/ QUOTE ]
I think I'll give .7b a try here. It can't hurt. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
There isn't much difference between v6 and v7 (or v6b and v7b) [Empire check only], but if you are using v6a before then I would try v7b, as Mogobu optimized the code in both the 'b' versions and it might be significantly faster (hence use less CPU) [still not had much feedback, but I guess alot of people are using the 'b' versions?]. Only problem is the 'a' and 'b' versions use different default parameters for timing etc, so it pretty hard to compare them atm.
I am planning on completely overhauling FPHG (and the method it uses) soonish and it should hopefully work much better then.
Juk [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|