Re: Car accident - damage might be > value of car...what\'s my play?
I hope this isn't taken the wrong way, because I'm the last person to advocate insurance fraud, but I do believe in fairness:
My truck got hit last year by a woman who missed a stop sign. It was considered totalled, which doesn't take much these days as repair costs are beyond belief.
The woman's insurance company lowballed me on the value. The only leverage I had was to 1) get checked by a doctor and 2) start documenting every minute I spent getting estimates, away from work, arranging alternate transportation, everything.
Re: the doctor visit- I had no intention of claiming non-existent injuries. But I know from experience that certain injuries are not initially apparent, and it's good to have this visit on record in the event of a LEGITIMATE injury.
Re: compensation for lost time
I believe it's reasonable to be compensated for time spent dealing with replacing a car due to an accident that's not your fault. There is a "lost wages/medical costs" component of the insurance claim that's separate from the car damage and by not signing off on this you can pressure the insurer to make a fair settlement.
Ultimately, the insurance adjuster just wants to get your case over with and has a lot of flexibility to accomplish this. If you truly wish to keep the car you may be able to get the adjuster not to total it and offer you a bit less on the car damage side, and make up for it on the lost wages side.
Again- I'm not saying you should scam your way into coming out better than you were going in. But in my opinion you shouldn't have to come out worse.
|