[luckyharr]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At any rate, I don’t think whether or not you should bet (or raise) depends on your “pot equity.”

[/ QUOTE ]

clearly indicate that he doesn't think pot equity plays much, if any, role in betting decisions. I strongly disagree with that assertion.

[/ QUOTE ]

As long as we have an equity advantage, we should be willing to put in as many bets as we can, right? Ray Zee pointed out earlier that more customers will likely provide us a larger equity advantage, and a less aggressive approach to induce multiway action is likely the best line. That makes sense as a reason to not face the field with two cold, but if we're presented the opportunity to face the whole field with another bet, I don't see why we would pass up that opportunity.