Re: The Top Set dilemma
luckyharr,
That is one disgusting example. Note that even with that murderer's row set of hands, the top set still has an equity advantage. There will often be scenarios where that top set does much better on the flop.
[ QUOTE ]
If you are always paying off bets on later streets, then it is a losing proposition.
[/ QUOTE ]
True. I think I mentioned something to that effect earlier. But we are allowed to fold when the situation becomes dire.
Buzz may or may not understand what we mean by equity. But based on these statements:
[ QUOTE ]
...not that your pot equity matters much (IMHO) unless you’re looking for a settlement.
[/ QUOTE ]
and
[ QUOTE ]
At any rate, I don’t think whether or not you should bet (or raise) depends on your “pot equity.”
[/ QUOTE ]
clearly indicate that he doesn't think pot equity plays much, if any, role in betting decisions. I strongly disagree with that assertion.
|