[bilbo-san]

[ QUOTE ]
1. I don't know what you mean with #1. as it relates to my conundrem.

2. I think 2 is even more scary than originaly given credit for.

3. I don't know what that has to do with my conundrem.

I don't think you get what I was saying at all. Gigabet called the push. I was saying that he should fold to the push.

Also, I am angry that you left off my BPA234 Conundrem title. For clarity, I should retitle it to the BETGO conundrem. I would apprecitate that you use that if you are going to respond further.\

Thanks!

[/ QUOTE ]

1) is important because when Villain calls, we get to see a flop. If we get a KT9 flop, we just might be able to play the hand profitably, no?

2) is not scary at all. Sometimes it is profitable to call when you are behind. Did you read my sentence about KK vs. AA?

3) is relevant because you are pretending that SB's (potential) actions in the example given are the only relevant ones.

Lastly this:

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think you get what I was saying at all. Gigabet called the push. I was saying that he should fold to the push.

[/ QUOTE ]

is false. I'm perfectly aware that that is what you are saying. And I'm saying that it is absurd. Gigabet is being given the right price to call even though he knows he is behind. If you fold in situations like this, you are leaving money on the table.