[Zetack]

[ QUOTE ]
OK, if we can all act like adults here, I got a weird idea. What is a site could "rig" the cards and still have the long-term win rates for hands like AA, KK, etc. not be statistically significantly different from what they should be?

I'm talking about "action flops". Let's say you flop set AA on a dry board. 3 players, all-in, bunch of money in the middle and bam, suckout, runner, two outer, whatever. You lost a big hand.

Then you have AA a bunch of other times and win those hands, but just small pots.

The point I'm making is that action flops could be created while still maintaining AA's (or any other two cards) long-term win percentage.

Once again, I don't think poker is rigged.

But what I do know is that the vast majority of posters on here know about jack sht about statistics, probability and fraud. I can blow 12-gauge size holes through every argument someone comes up with on how it isn't "rigged".

[/ QUOTE ]

3/4 of an inch holes? Is that large when it comes to rhetoric?

--Zetack