[mjkidd]

Tony -- The rakeback at 2/4 limit is about 3-4 BB/100, so if you sat out 100 hands, not defending your binds with ANYTHING (not even AA or KK), you'd pay .75 BB per ten hands, or 7.5 BB/100. So limit, you'd lose. Personally, I don't know what the rakeback at a 50 dollar ring NL game would be per 100...probably 6-7 PTBB? So at NL, you might be able to nearly break even not playing a hand. If you play short-stacked and move in with solid starting hands and fold everything else, you'd probably be a very significant winner.

I know how much you love shortstacks, so I'm sure this strategy would be appealing to you. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]