[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Even Daniel wasn't considering them. He was most worried about 99 or 55 and not really 88 (according to his own mumblings), and I think his analysis was right on of course.

[/ QUOTE ]

Daniel was mumbling about the hands that beat him. He always does that. But that was not his analysis. He said himself he couldn't believe Gus wouldn't bet the river with those hands- that's why he called. And I guarantee he also considered 95, 85, and 65 as possibilities.

I'm waiting to hear why 95 and 85 don't fit the action, but 65 does.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, because it's like 50 times less likely Gus raises PF and calls a reraise with 95/85 than with 65.