[DeliciousBass]

I have zero clue as to what the ruling should be but I think of it like this...

...if I run up a $600 stack and my table breaks up but I get a move to the same game at a different table, I would like to take my entire stack...

The people at the table that I'm about to sit down at are not required to reduce their chip stacks to the max buy-in so why should I be disadvantaged as I have already been playing.

Of course, this is probably dead wrong and being that I play almost exclusively online, I have never had the good fortune to have a table break when I am way up and then bring that stack to another table (same game).

So I'm guessing that the right answer is, "Sucks that the table broke sir, max buy-in is $200 if you would like to move. Can I get you a falafel while you wait?"