View Single Post
  #9  
Old 08-11-2006, 08:44 PM
Flight_Risk Flight_Risk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: bluff-raising the river
Posts: 966
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
So. Before the ME began, I had a list of people I hoped would win the WSOP, obviously speaking from a "Good for the game" point of view.

I wanted a woman to win.
I wanted a teenager to win.
I wanted someone good looking to win.
I wanted a poker celebrity to win.
I wanted a poker pro celebrity to win.
I wanted a complete retard to win.

Here's what I didn't want to win:

Anyone old
Anyone who didn't speak english
Anyone who didn't want to represent the game
Anyone rich
Anyone who represented themself very poorly at the table
Anyone who would cause "average people" to dislike them at the table.

Jamie Gold is middle aged. I think an [censored] at the table. Nobody has ever heard of him. He's not good looking. He's not a chick. He doesn't want to represent the game(ala Raymer).

Could anyone worse have won? Am I really off here? I just don't see this guy attracting ANYONE new to the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

It won't really matter if he doesn't attract anyone new to the game when online poker is banned in the U.S. The poker boom as a whole is gonna mushroom inward and you're not gonna see tournaments this size again.

Flight_Risk
Reply With Quote