[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No computer can comprehend human emotions. You can program the correct math but not the emotional variable.
[/ QUOTE ]
Are you
sure?
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, because there is a difference between "on going research" and a finished product.
Aaron Brown mentioned a few different examples of bio feedback bots in another thread, but the best example was 80% accuracy. We're talking about the
perfect bot. And those werent taking into account outside factors other than the poker game itself.
Some examples:
While I'm in a hand Meg Tilly sits next to me wearing a low cut dress that showcases her magnificent breasts. She smiles at me and says "Hi". Now obviously I find her hot so my heartrate increases, breathing speeds up, my body temparature rises, and I start sweating.
Or I owe some guy a lot of money. I'm in a hand and he walks up and demands his money or he'll hurt me. I dont have it so my heartrate increases, breathing speeds up, my body temparature rises, and I start sweating.
I'm bluffing to a huge pot against a flush draw and overcards. My heartrate increases, breathing speeds up, my body temparature rises, and I start sweating.
And playing online there could be literally dozens of reasons that heartrate increases, breathing speeds up, body temparature rises, and players start sweating that noone but the player would know why because noone can see him.
How could a bot or the fanny pack Mr.Brown mentioned tell the difference of what's causing this? My arguement is you cannot program a bot to tell the difference because it cannot comprehend human emotions. It would have to have human emotions itself and so far that only happens in Star Trek (Commander Data).
[quote="Snoggins"] The "Deus Ex Machina" post ruled.
[/ QUOTE ] I thought so. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]